We take on submissions and appeals selectively, only where there is a genuine planning case.
We are selective about the submissions and appeals we take on. We act where there is a genuine planning case: a proposal that is poorly conceived, overbearing in scale, or that fails to respect the character and context of its setting. Where a development is sound, we will say so.
Once Part 4 commences, 2026 a submission, or an appeal by anyone other than the applicant, on a file under the Planning and Development Act 2024 must be accompanied by a declaration under section 588 that it is not made to delay the development or to obtain a payment, and a submission to a planning authority must follow the prescribed form: a short summary where it runs over 1,000 words, no links, images or unlicensed attachments, and the relevant facts only. The draft form states that a submission that breaks the format is invalid. We prepare every submission and appeal to those requirements; the form is explained in making a submission once Part 4 commences.
That discipline is what gives our representations weight. A submission grounded in policy, precedent and sound planning judgement is likely to carry more influence with a planning authority or An Coimisiún Pleanála than a generic objection, and experience as a fee-per-case planning inspector with An Coimisiún Pleanála informs how a case is put to a decision-maker.
Observations on a planning application during the public-consultation period, setting out clear, policy-based grounds where a proposal would cause genuine harm.
First- and third-party appeals, preparing the grounds, the planning argument and the supporting evidence to the standard the Commission expects.
Informed submissions during the preparation or review of a development plan, where zoning, objectives or policy wording matter to a client's interest.
An assessment of whether a scheme respects its context in scale, massing, overlooking, traffic and amenity, and whether a case stands up.
The practice acts for residents' associations, businesses, landowners and public bodies on significant schemes, and gives a frank view at the outset on whether there is a case worth making.